Summary of a Professional Ethics Article Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Summary of a Professional Ethics Article - Essay Example This is quite synonymous to the fact that every citizen can avail medical facilities when they require it. In the United States, there are several active private organizations that are providing legal services to the general public on a very low price. Their charges are not dependent on the market price. Government is also taking an active part in providing legal facilities to the citizens where they cannot afford one. In order to determine who provisions these legal services, the author has taken a few assumptions. One such assumption involves that the community has accepted an adversary system. The adversarial system involves having advocates from both parties and then having a judge or a jury decides what is right (Corrin,  2004, p.  3). It is assumed that the citizens will have 4 basic rights: Every citizen is entitled to log a complaint to a judge or a tribunal, once a complaint is logged, the other party has to come in front of the court and explain their actions, they have a right to unanimously agree on the decision the judge has made and if the complaining party wishes, they can have the decision implemented. Since the judge is only involved for the decision making process, it is also assumed that the parties will gather their evidences (Richards & Rathbun,  1999, p.  6). ... This system relies on both parties to unanimously agree with the decision placed by the judge and the judge to be impartial (Glendon, Wright-Carozza, & Picker,  2008, p.  101). Once the judicial system is setup, it is important to understand the need for the community to be well aware of their rights to avoid injustice. The citizens should be well equipped with knowledge to know the legal proceedings and understand what the results will be. In case the trial at hand is completely new and has complications, necessary legal advice needs to be provided to make the citizen aware of the possible outcomes of the legal proceedings. If we look at the other side of the coin, citizens might start exercising their rights for things that they were not aware of or did not care about earlier. To maintain a balance between both situations, community needs to be educated on their rights and should know when they can place an appeal in the court. The major drawback of this system arises due to ig norance of people who cannot effectively present their case (Hale,  2004, p.  31). This way the wrong party may win the case. So adversarial system may end up providing injustice and may be used as a tool to protect a specific group of people who can play around with the ignorance of other people. This may ignite them to try for justice outside the legal bounds. The judiciary that was not ready to protect the ignorant or non participant may now be readily protecting them. However, state is expected to be less biased in an adversarial system as the case is represented through attorneys from each side and are expected to be professional and loyal representatives. They are also given ample time to assess and then reassess all evidences gathered before they give their decision. So this